0.05 and a statistical power of 0.8 implying a false negative rate of 1 - 0.8 = 0.2.
With these parameters, the analysis plan looks like:
Create the Groups
In this analysis, you only have two groups: acontrol group and a treatment group. Both have the same number of samples on average, so set both of their weights to 1.
Set Up the Comparisons
To compare the treatment group to the control group, use aoneVsAll comparison specification.
Set Up the Hypotheses
The hypotheses consist of two metrics: a crash rate metric and a consumption metric. Use a non-inferiority hypothesis for the crash rate metric because to accept a slight increase. Set the margin to 1%. To not wait until the end of the experiment to learn about increased crash rates, analyze the crash rate sequentially. Use a group sequential test to analyze the data sequentially. For the consumption metric, use a superiority hypothesis with a minimum detectable effect of 3%. Anything less than 3% is not practically meaningful in this case, so you want to design the test for this effect size. You want to analyze the consumption at the end of the experiment, so select a regular z-test. Add a single segment entry with an empty dimensions map to signal that the test has no segmentation. Your analysis plan at this stage is:Create the Decision Rule
Your decision rule is to ship the experiment if the guardrail is significantly non-inferior and the success metric is significantly superior. The decision rule is logicallycrashes AND consumption. You write it as:

